It is not the correct document. Nobody is suggesting that an original birth certificate from Hawaii would not be accepted.
The approved method for a state to prove an official document is to apply a seal and the signature of an appropriate official. Once this is done, the document is proved as official and must be accepted as authentic by all Federal courts, and courts of all other states.
That you feel the document is somehow incorrect is legally meaningless. Your opinion does not negate the provision of the Constitution, Art. 4, Sec. 1.
The founders were not idiots. The document certified must be a *VALID* document of the type being sought. I believe the commonly used legal language is a "true and correct copy of the original."
You don't put a official stamp of approval on a horse racing schedule and call it a birth certificate. It is false on the face of it, official state stamp notwithstanding.
That you feel the document is somehow incorrect is legally meaningless.
The fault, dear friend, is not with me. It is with a system so rigid in it's processes and procedures that it can be convinced to accept crap as the truth.
But while we are on the subject, is there an enforcement mechanism for presidential qualifications? and if so, in your opinion, what would that be?