BTTT!!!
*THAT* is more like the reaction I was expecting/hoping for.
This particular law book was prolific in the 1820 era in Pennsylvania. William Rawle very well knew about it, yet he wrote his own book "A View of the Constitution" in which he knowingly contradicted what his own supreme court said.
This is why I say William Rawle was deliberately lying. He had been told the truth, and chose to promulgate a falsehood.