Just once, just one measly time, could someone taking a pic of something, anything, UFO, UAP,alien mothership, up in the air, under water, over the white hut, anywhere, use a camera with actual film in it. Digital cameras always seem to take fuzzy, useless, meaningless, photoshopable shots that never define ANYTHING.
Our own US Navy geniuses have some of the best cameras on the planet. They still have available 300 mm super high resolution film that can read the label on an ant’s underwear. But would they take a pic using it? Nooooo way. All we get from everybody is fuzzy digital krap. And some folks think the digital cameras are degraded by the disgronificators on the targets?
I keep an SLR in each of my trucks. When strangeness happens I can get it with an actual , clear photo.
Twitter had a FUBAR IT department seriously lacking in fundamentals. Children and criminals were running the IT division of Twitter. 5000+ people had access to live production data/environment. They didn’t even have dev and QA servers or testing data. Developers did their changes DIRECTLY IN PRODUCTION!
Great thread here about it:
https://twitter.com/AvidHalaby/status/1602127460677844993
Twitter Whistleblower Disclosure
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/22186683/twitter-whistleblower-disclosure.pdf
Is a DSLR worth spit ?
The trick is to know which ant to photograph.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)