If same sex marriage is legal, anything goes. The guy’s lawyer will use this argument as legal defense. A couple of years from now the jury will accept this argument. Who says he was not in love with his dog and they were both exercising their first A adult rights. We must not be so judgmental.
“...they were both exercising their first A adult rights.”
That won’t work until dogs are given first amendment rights. Maybe he should identify as a dog. That could legally be accepted. And they couldn’t take him to court as they cannot try a dog for sexual misadventures. Happens, and is accepted, all the time. Loophole (sorry).
wy69