[tlozo]

You care more about Ukraine than America.

Last year we spent the equivalent of 5% of our military budget on Ukraine, which resulted in the destruction of the russian army as an offensive threat to NATO, with zero loss of our servicemen. Good thing, or not?

[kiryandil]

Last year we spent the equivalent of 5% of our military budget on Ukraine,

I like zero percent better, globalist.

[EEGator]

Not a threat to NATO.

Not good long term. Blowback for flipping the SWIFT switch will last.
Greater economic strength for Asia moving forward long term.
The idea of Russia regaining the Soviet Union is comical.
The greatest threat to the world is globalism.

[Who is John Galt?]

Last year we spent the equivalent of 5% of our military budget on Ukraine, which resulted in the destruction of the russian army as an offensive threat to NATO, with zero loss of our servicemen. Good thing, or not?

"The russian army as an offensive threat to NATO?" Give me a break - Putin's 'clown car' army couldn't even take Kiev. And since the US is running budget deficits, every penny of your "5% of our miltary budget" (now up to ~$100 billion) that we threw at Ukraine is borrowed money. If you're having paranoid dreams about Soviet tanks rolling through the Arc de Triomphe, with Brezhnev leading the way in a ZIL limo, you might consider the money well spent.

[NorseViking]

The wishful thinking is funny, but would you cry victim once it gets back to you like in 1812 and 1945?