You’re the only person addressing the important issue, her sons problem.
Of course most are just ogling and rating.
This includes the "news" coverage of the New York Post.
But reading more closely to the account, such as it is in the Post, one finds, "I have bills to pay and a mortgage and it wasn't even a difficult decision."
At the bottom of the article one reads that her "hubby" -- an odd "news" parlance -- took part in the whole.
NOTE: Nowhere is it mentioned what or how severe or how costly the son's "stomach ailment" is. Even the Glasgow Live (I worked in Glasgow decades back) actually reports on the son's "ailment."
Isn't it odd that mention of mortgage payments and such are part of her story? Go Fund Me sorts of things are out there to raise funds for such. Her and her "hubby" made the choice to peddle photos. Everything about this article, the Glasgow Live coverage and more tells one salient point.
The reporters are NOT focused on the son at bloody all. Tits and ass, as the song lyric from "A Chorus Line" sings....