Posted on 12/01/2022 8:20:42 PM PST by ConservativeMind
Is your point that the problem was with pure oxygen but not with concentrated oxygen?
Is concentrated oxygen like you get with hyperbaric oxygen therapy —safe?
Technically hyperbaric can be low inspired content. Using pressure drives it to tissue level instead of hemoglobin delivered. Hyperbaric for wound actually counts on free radicals to sterilize the wound.
The injury from superoxide tx takes days to develop. Although damage can be chemically measured in 12 hours or so actual fibrosis and clinically significant fibrosis takes a week or so.
When I give a general anesthetic there are reasons to bump the inspired fraction a little. Room air is 21% oxygen. I usually run patients around 30% all things being equal. But 60% is the real line you only cross if you have to
As well, I have met Nurses who believe that a CO2 Retainer should not be provided supplemental Oxygen. Such completely misunderstand the problem. I knew one Nurse who constantly dropped the FIO2 once she heard ‘retainer.’ She killed one Patient after I left for the day. That one was terminal, but dying of Oxygen starvation was not right. She was too stupid to reason with. She accelerated that expiration only slightly, but I watched her ever after until I left or she was terminated.
I don't know what people think Hyperbaric is, but probably they ought not discuss it from absolute ignorance.
IIRC, excess O2 can dry out the coating on avoili, a fatty substance called the pulmonary surfacant that keeps avioli from collapsing. (also dried out by smoking)
related, from 2016:
Too Much Oxygen: Hyperoxia and Oxygen Management in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26820270/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.