[Dr. Franklin]

If SCOTUS wants to hear the case, they will hear the case. Otherwise, the case appears to have obvious defects, like the jurisdictional issue of suing Congress members in your home state, rather than in D.C. It appears that SCOTUS likes the idea of blaming Congress for SCOTUS refusing to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania, which it was mandated to hear under its original jurisdiction clearly stated in the constitution. As I have noted before, POTUS is also a "consul" in the original meaning of the word, i.e., the chief magistrate of a republic.

[C210N]

like the jurisdictional issue of suing Congress members in your home state, rather than in D.C.

If one sues ones congress critters in your "home state" of the form of "STATE of XYZ", where XYZ is one of the 50 states, then one IS suing in the the capitol city of DC. Note the caps.