Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RandFan

No problem with this as long as she can afford them. WITHOUT taxpayer assistance.


5 posted on 11/22/2022 8:40:31 AM PST by Twotone (While one may vote oneself into socialism one has to shoot oneself out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Twotone

Agreed!

A friend of mine has 7 kids, and gets a lot of rude comments about it. But she and her husband are self-supporting, and often volunteer to help those who need help.

I told her that when people make rude comments about the size of her family, she can tell them I gave her my share. I can’t have kids, so it evens out.


62 posted on 11/22/2022 10:40:53 AM PST by Ellendra (A single lie on our side does more damage than a thousand lies on their side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

The correct obstetric term for >5 live births is “grand multipara”, and every one after 5 takes more women out of the game.

Not every body can do 10, or 12. It used to be a big part of OB practice to advise women when further pregnancies became dangerous.

Obviously, anti-natalist busybodies should STFU but it’s also not the case that just because this woman wants 17 she should be cheered on.


75 posted on 11/22/2022 12:30:28 PM PST by Jim Noble (The Decline of America is a Choice )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson