Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hinckley buzzard

I agree with you, but even then one apparently can’t always get a protective order. In other words, the argument the gun grabbers make is utterly demolished in two different ways: (1) no, you can’t always get a protective order, and (2) they don’t actually protect you even if you get one. Therefore, (3) get a gun to protect yourself, and (4) view anyone who wants to prevent you from doing that as essentially wanting you to be murdered.


11 posted on 11/21/2022 7:25:41 AM PST by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan

Protective orders are mainly useful against guys who are of no actual physical threat.


43 posted on 11/21/2022 11:23:12 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson