[Dan in Wichita]

Now you're singing a different tune. Earlier you came across as an election fraud denier... saying the only reason Lake lost is because she was a lousy candidate, and the voters rejected her for it, implying there was no fraud involved.

Now you're making it sound as if it is hopeless to try to reverse a fraudulent election. Unfortunately, it may be hopeless, because the corruption is so firmly entrenched... but we've got to at least try.

[Brilliant]

I’m saying that if what you say is true, then it’s hopeless unless you can prove it to a court. If you can’t prove it to a court, then don’t make the allegation. I think if we have better candidates then it will be harder to cheat. A few fraudulent votes will likely make no difference and a lot will be easier to detect. She lost by 19,000. The best she can hope to make up in a recount is about 100 or 200. 19,000 is a lot of votes in a race like this.