To: lowbridge
Charging to 80% vs 100% is not shorter nor more affordable, unless one bases all of their financial decisions on the minimum payment cost on their credit card?
Idiots.
11 posted on
11/18/2022 6:04:48 AM PST by
cyclotic
(Follow 1776rm.com. Fighting for our Constitution. @1776RM on Truth)
To: cyclotic
HUH? We’re expected to pay the credit cards? 😲😁👍⛽
20 posted on
11/18/2022 6:09:51 AM PST by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
To: cyclotic
Yeah. When I was a teenager in the very early ‘70s, I would never fill up my tank because I couldn’t afford it. I typically get a bucks worth and then I’d have to get a bucks worth later on. Now I just get it down to a quarter tank or less and fill it up. The idea of not filling up your tank because it’s too expensive is third world crap.
33 posted on
11/18/2022 6:20:25 AM PST by
cuban leaf
(My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
To: cyclotic
Charging to 80% vs 100% is not shorter nor more affordable, unless one bases all of their financial decisions on the minimum payment cost on their credit card?
If the charging station is based on time, not amount actually transmitted, the last 20% may take as much time as the first 80% It also isn't great for the battery to fast charge and full-charge all the time.
42 posted on
11/18/2022 6:32:41 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(What was 35% of the Rep. Party is now 85%. And it’s too late to turn back—Mac Stipanovich )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson