Replies

Click to skip to bottom of this long opinion post about babyfist and Q drop authenticity.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/15/2022 Vol.434, Q Day 1844, Kalam wrote:
Well what do you know?
Is this New Q Drop to far removed from the predictive date that it doesn't count?
Or is the feeling coming back?
InQuiring minds want to know.
I'm not sure I understand the question but I'll comment in case it's the issue brought up a few days ago.
There have been a few posts saying that Q is not posting anymore, that it's a larper or larpers.
Yet Trump validated content in a recent drop.
Content was posted that claims a larper named babyfist posted on the Q board and then admitted it, apologized etc.
Note the classic troll effort to kill off Q 'politely'
"Q is now an Idea. It is no longer a person/team, ideas never die. Q is now forever."
How inspiring!
After babyfist claimed to have accessed the Q board and left a drop, Scavino posted an image of babyfist - or so it was claimed. But that's not true.
Scavino, posting in response to the overturn of Roe v. Wade, posted a picture of a baby fist bumping Trump. The howling began, with people claiming it was comms - that Scavino was signalling the drop in question was babyfist's.
Nothingburger. Microchip - The Sequel.
But the (larper) legend was already born - Scavino's picture was falsely claimed to be his signal the prior drop was not from Q, but was from babyfist. Babyfist is a larper, but his larp was to try to convince people he posted Q drops.
No one on the Trump team, or Trump himself ever advised us not to trust Q's drops. The timing of the return of Ol' babyfist, claiming Q drops after 2020 were fake, just happens to coincide with tough times for some - when MAGA and FREEQ peeps are disappointed with the 'big announcement' Trump made.
Yeah. Nothingburger. I didn't recall the babyfist stuff until a friend reminded me, and I now recall checking it out back then (who wouldn't?) and deciding it was a larp, and moving on.
The language of Q drops has changed, but it seems to partially harken back to the start of Q when it was new to people. If you look back at the earliest Q drops, they were not challenging connect the dots because they were the first posts that people would read.
I think now we have moar 'first time readers' since Trump has reTruthed memes of himself with Q+ on his lapel, or Q/WWG1WGA/17. New normie readers have different skill sets than 4ch Anons, are emotionally drained from being out in the cold throughout the bitter years of intense psyops, and might be discouraged by drops if they containted the ol' reflection on the side of a watch case comms. Just sayin'.
Speaking only for myself, it's always wise to keep an eye on the board and trust but verify, and no one has shown any evidence the drops aren't real. I have confidence in them; they continue to be productive, and if excerpts of the drops are good enough for Trump to use in his speech, the drops are good enough for me. :D