Posted on 11/15/2022 7:11:53 AM PST by RandFan
"I would say Lindsey Graham lost six states"
@JackPosobiec
Prove us wrong
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
CHEATING cost GOP AGAIN!
If you don't have the courage to say so, YOU are the problem!
Many people said unhelpful things, but this was a straight steal!
Yes he did, and he did it on purpose.
Definitely a major factor.
I totally forgot about it... Did it energize Dems?
It sure didn’t help.
The old faggot did it on purpose.
Whatever the effect, certainly it was Miss Lindsey’s intent to empower the party of gender fluidity.
If you don't have the courage to say so, YOU are the problem!
/sarc
Yeah, there's circumstantial evidence, and there are reports where individuals had a hard time voting or were prevented by some cockup or another, but no smoking gun showing thousands of illegal votes changing an election result.
You are correct.
You ignorance of the facts and unwillingness to face the evidence is the plague facing America.
It was moronic. Graham has some of the worst political instincts of any politician in a party known for poor political instincts.
Agreed.
It was one on of the dumbest(?) things to come out of Ms Lindsey’s pie hole in many years.
If you believe it was not intentional, you haven’t been paying attention.
National Divorce is the answer-
Choose Freedom - Choose Peace
States rights go out the window on life and liberty. Life is life. That is why so many prolife people have been aghast at the state argument over killing babies. That's why Lindsey brought it up.
Wrong? Not really...it was a COMBINATION of factors...cheating, Lindsay Graham motivating female voters, and McConnell withdrawing financial support for Senate candidates.
You[r] ignorance of the facts and unwillingness to face the evidence is the plague facing America.
Of course it did...and Graham KNEW it.
Yes!
That was my first thought when I read Graham’s statement here on FR, and I fervently prayed I would be proven wrong.
“... it was always a national issue.”
Okay, but constitutionalists like Scalia had been saying for decades, “Return the issue to the states.” That viewpoint finally prevailed at the SCOTUS, and we could have stuck with it as a tactical victory. As a pro-lifer, I don’t philosophically have an issue with a national ban, but why try it when it had no chance of passing? Can Lindsey really have thought his “brainchild” had a shot of passing Schumer/Pelosi-controlled congress? Really? Of course not. The only thing it accomplished was creating a rebuttal for the Dems every time a Republican candidate said, “We’ve returned the issue to the states.” The Dems were able to turn around and say, “What are you talking about? At this very moment, Linda Graham is cooking up bill for a national ban.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.