On children she means... Sorry that’s not clear.
It’s clear to me, and she’s right. They do this for profits. What happened to do no harm? Pretty sure that’s gone OUT the window. These poor children. Some selfish adult that doesn’t actually care about them mutilates and makes them unable to ever have children naturally. Criminal. Absolutely criminal.
On children? Any kind of tampering with human gender rather than preparing one for life's duties for the one naturally occurring at conception and manifested at live birth?
Only IMPRISONED?
o Mental or psychological -- decertification from counseling license or ability to dispense drugs of any kind, especially psychoactive ones
o Biochemically prescriptive forced misdirection -- decertification from counseling and medical practice, imprisonment if necessary to physically prohibit
o Irrepairable drastic surgery -- if beyond repair of physical abnormalities (I've seen images of hermaphrodites whose DNA obviously cannot be changed) -- The surgeon ignores the child's mature judgment. Should he/she have his fingers removed as a penalty?
o Embryonic genetic modification -- this technologist is the worst danger to the God-created race of Adam, bringing in fantastic reproducing creatures, deliberately a servant of Satan; and if my opinion was put into service, would be subject to termination by the judgment of a constitutional court and jury forthwith.
Even Jehovah God, the omnipotent Creator chooses not to overwhelm a human creature's preferences against existing known or felt evidence; but He does see to the dispensation of rewards and consequences of attitudes and behaviors, according to His Holy Scriptures, both temporal and spiritual.
The real problem is that our system of generating medical practitioners and licensing them does not, and cannot require them to be prepared after the way that the Apostle Luke, trained in the medical discipline of his day, was spiritually experienced enough to be able commit eyewitness evidence to Holy Scripture, but also able to minister faultlessly guided by his Master, his contemporary, Jesus of Nazareth.
Did Moses, a θεράπων (therapōn, servant of God. Heb. 3:5) able to provide healing in both the divine dimension as well as physical, provide any evidence further than recording the Jehovah Elohim sex modification applied to Adam's DNA once for all time (Gen. 2:22-24), no longer needed to carry out God's desire for a population of willing, loving, serving, companionable subjects and friends?
Did Jesus of Nazareth, Creator Incarnate, a physician in every realm imaginable, feel a need to commit again such a sacred task upon a human's sinful sickening wish?
Did Peter, or Paul take that as one of the modes by which the Mighty God would be glorified?
Should anyone, any biochemist or surgeon in this scientifically-advanced age, presume to have entered a time prophesied for transgenderism to come to pass and be Divinely approved?
I cannot find this anywhere in the comprehensive book of prophetic writings that The God has lovingly issued to mankind for this age, when every temptation to wickedness has been offered, and the power to overcome those testing impulses has long been available.
Can you, the reader of this observation, find anything contradictory and justifiable?