Still not giving up the narrative, no matter the facts that pile up to the contrary. Peter Pelosi is a drunken old pervert, who INVITED this supposed assailant into his home, and was engaged in a little “rough stuff”.
This is San Francisco, after all, and no “far right-winger” is safe there. David DePape is no “far right-winger”, in any way, shape, form, or manner. Therefore, he considered himself to be “safe”.
Why would super wealthy Paul Pelosi pay a dirty homeless nudist for some rough stuff? That narrative doesn’t hold up. IMO.