Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
What they call "impossible" means they don't know how to interpret the results at present.

One of the first crises of this sort was when the Pythagoreans realized that the the square root of 2 is irrational. It was so earthshaking that this finding was kept hidden and secret for many years. Today, irrational numbers are not a bother.

Another "impossible" situation was the square root of -1. Today we have an interpretation of that, and all electrical engineers are quite comfortable using the square root of -1, as part of an "imaginary number". In reality these numbers are not "imaginary" at all, but offer a way of describing the reality of electrical circuits.

I'm sure that someday the "string theorists" will find a plausible interpretation of their results.

17 posted on 10/27/2022 2:21:26 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Governor Dinwiddie

A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it ...

An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over and converting its opponents: it rarely happens that Saul becomes Paul. What does happen is that its opponents gradually die out, and that the growing generation is familiarized with the ideas from the beginning: another instance of the fact that the future lies with the youth.

— Max Planck, Scientific autobiography, 1950, p. 33, 97


61 posted on 10/27/2022 4:08:44 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson