so let him in only to have him disrupt the court and start the cycle over and over and over again???
they have proved the audio is more than sufficient and he has full view of the jury.
i still remember the bobby seal trial...
That is what my wife told me too.
Well, it is what it is. And unfortunately I think she gave him good justification for an appeal because she removed him and forfeited his legal right to finish with his defense for him against his wishes.
Pain in the ass or not... Illinois vs Allen doesn’t seem to remove his right to represent himself as she used it. I hate the jerk, but I think she used the case law incorrectly to keep him from presenting his following witnesses and this probably opened the door for a strong appeal.