Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: aMorePerfectUnion
No matter which side of this issue one is on, we are the lab rats.

Wouldn't it make sense to have about half of any population getting the shot and the other half not?

Otherwise you have no control group.

Also, suppose the shot proves to be deadly. Those who didn't get it would stand a better chance of survival.

Suppose the shot turns out to be a life saver?

Those who get will be more likely to survive.

Since about half of people want or don't want the shot, isn't it in the best interest of the human race to just leave it at that?

8 posted on 10/22/2022 2:03:14 PM PDT by Mogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mogger

-> Since about half of people want or don’t want the shot, isn’t it in the best interest of the human race to just leave it at that

That would required informed consent
It would require correct safety testing before giving to humans
It would require accurate records of adverse events and second order consequences

It hasn’t happened yet


22 posted on 10/22/2022 2:51:03 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Fraud vitiates everything. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson