Don’t have a problem with your numbers but the rankings you seem to skip a few places, like 4,5,7 etc. Understand the ties but why the place omissons?
Thanks
But thanks for asking about it because I realized I made an error in the ranking this week (I think it had to do with me switching from MS Excell to OpenOffice and chuckallen going ahead of major_gaff). My position should be Tied for fourth and everybody below that level was listed one number too high. The top 3 guys are listed correctly.
If anyone requests I'll gladly repost the corrected table, if not I'll save JimRob some bandwidth.