In principle I agree with you. However, Scientology is very relevant in this case. There are eye witnesses to the head of Scientology beating other Scientologists and of them allowing this without retaliation because ‘he’s the leader of Scientology’. If you are told to keep dirty laundry within Scientology, and you are a true Scientology believer, you don’t report things. The consequences for doing so can be very significant.
My bad, while I don’t care about cults, I didn’t mean to imply that Scientology isn’t relevant. I mean I am neutral. I have no skin in the game for the actor or Scientology. When it comes to a court of law I don’t think any evidence is not relevant as long as it is legitimate evidence according to law, even if is about a Church or cult. With that said, when it comes to crimes like rape, there needs to be tangible DNA evidence or witnesses to find someone guilty. It’s an ugly fact on the witness part because I doubt many rapes have witnesses. That’s one of things that makes rape such a terrible crime.