Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

If you have O- blood, your risk was basically cut in half.


12 posted on 10/16/2022 3:31:29 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Some men want to see the world burn. It is they that want you to buy an electric car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

If you have O- blood, your risk was basically cut in half.

My sister has O negative and she got it. She was vaxxed and boosted.

I have B negative, had two jabs, no booster, never got it. I have several friends who were jabbed and boosted and got it twice.


41 posted on 10/16/2022 4:04:12 PM PDT by angry elephant (Been with Trump since huge 2016 Washington state rally in May.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

That’s interesting. I’m O neg.


66 posted on 10/16/2022 5:05:38 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

Blood type O and covid:

2.1. Data supporting blood type correlation with severity of illness
Ray et al [21] published the largest study to date in Canada, investigating the association of blood type with COVID-19. This population-based cohort study from Ontario included a total of 225,556 patients who underwent polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2.

Among these, 7,071 (3.1%) tested positive for the virus. Adjusted relative risks (ARRs) were calculated after adjusting for patient demographic data and medical comorbidities.

The authors found that individuals with type O blood were less likely to contract SARS-CoV-2 compared with non–type O blood groups (ARR = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–0.92). Rhesus (Rh)-negative individuals were also less likely to be diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 (ARR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73–0.85).

Interestingly, individuals with O-negative blood type were further protected against viral infection (ARR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66–0.83). Type O individuals were at decreased risk compared to non–type O individuals with regard to secondary outcomes, such as severe illness and death (ARR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78–0.97). Rh-negative individuals were also at lower risk of severe illness and mortality compared to Rh-positive patients (ARR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68–0.96).

Taken together, the authors concluded that type O and Rh-negative blood groups may be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and illness.


72 posted on 10/16/2022 5:23:27 PM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Anyone, who can make you believe in absurdities, can make you commiit atrocities!!" ~ (Voltaire)!, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson