T.B. Yoits wrote: “Just stop. That’s what they said publicly but their emails, that they had to be sued to release, showed they changed THEIR definition because the real definition was “problematic” and that people wouldn’t accept the Jim Jones Jab since it wasn’t a vaccine.”
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Again, just stop. The Jim Jones Jab wasn’t “offered” to the control group. It was directed in order to remove the control group data. Spin it any way you’re paid to but if there’s no control group, there’s no valid experiment.”
You’re the one who should stop spreading falsehoods.
“The CDC has altered the language in the definition of vaccination on its website, including after the development of COVID-19 vaccines, but the changes were made to prevent potential misinterpretations, and did not alter the overall definition, according to the agency. Experts confirmed to The Associated Press that the changes reflect the evolution of vaccine research and technology.”
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-976069264061
Show me where the CDC “directed” that all members of the conrol group be vaccinated.
Ethical Considerations for Unblinding and Vaccinating COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Placebo Group Participants
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.702960/full
You insist on ignoring what the CDC said in their own emails; THEY changed THEIR definition of vaccine because the mRNA shots do NOT meet the definition of a vaccine.
Nice try. The CDC didn't direct injecting the control group in the Pfizer study. Pfizer did.