Posted on 10/12/2022 4:49:31 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
yup.
I read '1984'...
Check out Zoom Earth and you can see weather for yourself from space ,LOL
I suspect, but I am not positive, that most climatologists are not mathematicians or programmers. They “consult” others for those details. There were a number of times in my own career that I programmed complex mathematical equations that I really didn’t understand, even though I have a decent math background. I did rely on mathematicians to test and verity the accuracy of my work, but they had no idea what I programmed. It was a black box to them. I suspect there are a lot of black boxes involved in climatology and no one person understands what’s inside all of them.
generally ... closely ....
At least one Seattle TV news station actually publishes the European model forecast if there is a significant disparity between that and the USA forecast.
The European model is almost always correct!
Current weather in Seattle has been very dry in September and October, which is the traditional start of our rainy season.
We also have an arson related wild fire in the Cascade foot hills that has destroyed our air quality for weeks.
This will be our third La Nina (unusually cold Pacific Ocean temps) winter in a row, which typically creates drought. In 2019 and 2020, that drought stayed south of Seattle. This year, we are catching it, too.
Take 20,000 year old ice cores into account then talk to me you self serving, must publish or perish, morons.
They programmed them to rain every day, just like their breakthrough programming to make San Diego sunny and 70 degrees every day
If they are so accurate, then where is the on the record list of specific forecasts that then happened?
These results are important because they suggest that current climate models represent large-scale weather patterns reasonably well in the Pacific Northwest.
This says a lot of nothing. It doesn't describe what they used as parameters for modeling. For what it's worth, they could have used 20 years of actual measurements and concluded that history is repeating itself when it comes to weather. In simple terms, nothing changed from the norm.
Still we are left with the impression that the white coated "scientists" are demi gods when it comes to climate prediction and we should listen to all of their predictions based on this.
Exactly. If you have dozens of models, one of them will predict the past better than the others. Then when one attempts to predict the future one finds that the model chosen is no better at predicting the future than the others.
It’s impossible to account for every variable, thus the models are GIGO.
The prediction is: Cloudy skies then rain and then cloudy skies then rain etc. 100% accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.