Well, they didn’t actually reverse it. The language is still included. But then they try to reassure users that they didn’t mean it. Not that the understanding of the meaning of that language is wrong, but that it was accidentally inserted. If they stated that people misinterpreted them, or that part A wasn’t meant to refer only to part C, D, and E, but not F, you could use their statement in a court to defend your money. But that they said they didn’t mean to, but left it in? That’s fuzzier.
They took out the “misinformation” part.