What’s misleading about it?
It's still not good, but the increase is for cardiac-related death during the 28 days post-vax.
The title you posted reads, ‘Florida Surgeon General: Covid mRNA vaccine found to cause 84% increase in DEATH for men ages 18-39”
Which is an absolute lie.
ONE cause of death increased by 84%.
I can tell you, not a lot of people die from cardiac issues age 18-39.
The real overall death rate for all people 18-39 might have risen far less than 1% if cardiac was the only rate increased.
Or think of it this way ...
If people dying from bathtub accidents increased from 20 per year to 200, how accurate would this title be:
DEATH RATE IN AMERICA INCREASED BY TEN TIMES!!!!
Big embarassment for the post millenial
“What’s misleading about it?”
Thread title: “. . .vaccine found to cause 84% increase in DEATH for men ages 18-39”
The report says “. . .84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination.”
Misleading:
1) “found to cause” — no, “cause” was not determined, the only finding was an association with “increase in the relative incidence,” may have nothing to do with the vax.
2) “increase in DEATH” — no, not DEATH (that is, all causes of death), but “cardiac-related death.”
3) “for men aged 18-39” — no, for “males 18-39 years old 28 days following mRNA vaccination.”
While there might be something to the analysis, something useful, it certainly does not conclude what the thread title says (or thinks) it does. Read the state’s “analysis” (link is in the thread). It has lots of limitations, including the total number of vaccinations individuals received were not considered (just deaths within 28 days of the LAST (which could also be first, or second, or third vax), and medical records were not used, just death certificates (which are notoriously poor for facts—most deaths do not have autopsies, and the doctors don’t put down the ICD or ACME codes, just words, such as “cardiac death” which might not even be the true cause of death—instead, coding clerks with vital statistic departments for the state or USA interpret the doctors’ entries on the DC’s in whatever fashion or bias they choose and try to conform them to the ICD codes (or using the ACME software—Automatic Classification of Medical Entry).