[daniel1212]

Which means you got 15.7% bad actors that regularly visit Freerepublic that responded to daniel1212 loaded question poll. With all of the 178 people admitting that Trumps people where responsible for the attacks. Which daniel1212 seemed to have added me to the "no" list without my consent (Post 80.) Admin Moderator I called you in here because I believe this will likely be used in the near future against Freerepublic. Given this was clearly a bunch of *loaded questions* legally not admissible in court. They will argue freerepublic needs more mediating/Moderating up to their standards or use one of their services for mediation/Moderating. Jim Rob isn't feeling up to this and they know it. My suggestion save this thread for when Freerepublic has to call a lawyer in the near future. I'm sorry I should've reported to you that daniel1212 was setting up a fake poll my first post.

"They will argue freerepublic needs more mediating/Moderating up to their standards or use one of their services for mediation/Moderating." Rather, it is you who is providing fodder for the canon of the Left which paints conservatives as irrational paranoid lying fanatics. Rationally speaking, you make a baseless biased assertion of "15.7% bad actors that regularly visit Freerepublic that responded to daniel1212. With all of the 178 people admitting that Trumps people where responsible for the attacks/ Which daniel1212 seemed to have added me to the "no" list without my consent (Post 80.)

Yet first of all, you can only speciously speculate that 178 were 15.7% of those who regularly visit Freerepublic, while according to the poll "bad actors" would overall be God-fearing conservatives, and none of whom necessarily affirmed that Trumps people were responsible for the attacks, as instead you can only read that into "support the violent actions of Jan. 6," or as soon edited in clarification, "Do you support the militant actions of Jan. 6 against protesters, or any by them (as alleged)?" and imagine that the readers understood this as "Trumps people where responsible for the attacks."

Meanwhile, it is you who posted links to video of "capital police handing bats to people out side the window" and "the doors opened from the in side" and thus indicated that no, you did not support the premise (that you read into the question) of Trump's ppl being behind those attacks. Thus my response in post 80, "So your answer is no (blank), that you do not support the violent actions of Jan. 6 (which is all that was first asked) as well as no to "the militant actions of Jan. 6 against protesters or any by them." And a logical deduction hardly needs your consent. That is hardly rational.

Finally, there was not "setting up a fake poll." Rather, as said, "I think this (non-commercial, internal) poll can help discern the make up of conservatives here" is what it helped to do, even if some irrational, illogical responses resulted. Meanwhile the Left has already censored me for my conservative contentions - which I warn about.

And I welcome the Admin Moderator to chime in here.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, ""bad actors" would overall be God-fearing conservatives"
Bad actors will make this site look the worst it can. Will say or do anything to that end. Yes they're regulars which I keep a personal list of 38 I'm sure are regulars that have nothing but contempt for this site and most of the freepers here. I have more that I'm not sure of yet.

Admin Moderator note after I said, "I believe this will likely be used in the near future against Freerepublic."
daniel1212 didn't deny this information would be use it against FR.

said, "Which daniel1212 seemed to have added me to the "no" list without my consent (Post 80.)"
daniel1212 said, "logical deduction hardly needs your consent. That is hardly rational."

Thank you for admitting you faked the poll.