Posted on 10/08/2022 8:21:55 AM PDT by daniel1212
Agree.
" If you brake the question up i can answer. " The issue is contentious, and with the Left having a heavy hand and with much that is yet to be revealed as to actors and events. But this poll was not about Jan. 6 nor intended to be, and the only question about it was brief and broad.
Poll results as of 6pm Sunday, Oct. 9 based upon original asked as posted in this page on a Saturday morning (before slight editing for clarifications, as seen here). Note: every respondent did not necessarily respond to all questions, thus not answering does not necessarily mean no. Take it for what it is worth (not too much as representative). Thank God for what is good. Out of a total of 178 who responded at all: |
1. Do you consider yourself to be Agnostic? 23 consider themselves to be Agnostic |
2. Atheist? 14 consider themselves to be Atheist |
3. Catholic or Orthodox? 41 consider themselves to be Catholic or Orthodox |
4. Evangelical Christian? 52 consider themselves to be Evangelical |
5. Jewish? 6 consider themselves to be Jewish |
6. Mainline Protestant? 40 consider themselves to be Protestant |
7. Are you male? 135 responded that they are male |
8. Are you female? 27 responded that are female |
9. White, non-Hispanic? 143 responded that they are White, non-Hispanic |
10. Hispanic? 4 responded that they are Hispanic |
11. Black? 4 responded that they are black |
12. If a Catholic, do you consider Jorge Mario Bergoglio to be the valid pope? 16 Catholics considered Jorge Mario Bergoglio to be the valid pope |
13. Do you consider yourself mainly to be a social conservative, whose main (not singular) concern is the moral condition and direction of this country? 103 consider themselves mainly to be social conservatives |
14. Do you consider yourself mainly to be a libertarian and or financial conservative? 81 consider themselves mainly to be libertarians and or financial conservatives |
15. Do you strongly favor US support of the state of Israel and its overall defensive actions against Islamic/Palestinian demands, rather than Israel being the real problem? 148 strongly favor US support of the state of Israel.... |
16. Do you mainly or strongly support Putin (if not all he does) in the war in Ukraine and opposing NATO, or Ukraine (if not all it does)? 41 mainly or strongly supported Putin... |
17. Do you support the violent actions of Jan. 6? 28 supported the violent actions of Jan. 6 |
18. Do you oppose the legalization of same-sex marriage, and requiring all states to validate the same? 123 oppose the legalization of same-sex marriage by SCOTUS... |
19. Do you oppose the legalization of abortion in most cases? 131 oppose the legalization of abortion... |
20. Do you oppose government funding for prophylactics drugs to help prevent HIV (and foster sodomy)? 91 oppose government funding for prophylactics drugs... |
21. Do you oppose government funding for birth control as well as abortion services in general? 127 oppose government funding for birth control as well as abortion... |
22. Do you personally practice or believe in contraception? 88 personally practice or believe in contraception |
Did you answer Yes to questions #15-22 as a social conservative? 72 answered Yes to questions #15-22 as a social conservative |
Did you answer Yes to questions #15-22 as a libertarian and or financial conservative? 53 answered Yes to questions #15-22 as a libertarian and or financial conservative |
Do you support reducing the national debt thru reduction in government bureaucracy and social welfare programs? 160 support reducing the national debt.... |
Do you support a stronger military? 151 support a stronger military |
Do you support stricter restrictions on immigration? 166 support stricter restrictions... |
Do you support less regulation of industry? 157 support less regulation of industry? |
Do you believe or strongly suspect 2020 voter fraud in the Presidential election was enough to change the outcome? 160 believed or strongly suspected 2020 voter fraud in the Presidential election was enough to change the outcome? |
Do you plan to vote for President Trump if he runs in 2024, or would you possibly vote for a candidate such as Ron Desantis, Ted Cruz, Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley... 154 plan to vote for President Trump if he runs in 2024? |
Do you believe unprecedented (in civilization's history) Climate Change toward a dangerously warmer planet is real? 23 believe unprecedented (in civilization's history) Climate Change toward a dangerously warmer planet is real? |
Do you expect to spend eternity with God/Jesus in Heaven as one saved by obedient faith, or in Hell, or just the grave... 83 expect to spend eternity with God/Jesus in Heaven as one saved by obedient faith... |
Do you expect to spend eternity with God/Jesus in Heaven as one who is good enough to be with God? 44 expect to spend eternity with God/Jesus in Heaven as one who is good enough to be with God |
I have no idea.
"They will argue freerepublic needs more mediating/Moderating up to their standards or use one of their services for mediation/Moderating." Rather, it is you who is providing fodder for the canon of the Left which paints conservatives as irrational paranoid lying fanatics. Rationally speaking, you make a baseless biased assertion of "15.7% bad actors that regularly visit Freerepublic that responded to daniel1212. With all of the 178 people admitting that Trumps people where responsible for the attacks/ Which daniel1212 seemed to have added me to the "no" list without my consent (Post 80.)
Yet first of all, you can only speciously speculate that 178 were 15.7% of those who regularly visit Freerepublic, while according to the poll "bad actors" would overall be God-fearing conservatives, and none of whom necessarily affirmed that Trumps people were responsible for the attacks, as instead you can only read that into "support the violent actions of Jan. 6," or as soon edited in clarification, "Do you support the militant actions of Jan. 6 against protesters, or any by them (as alleged)?" and imagine that the readers understood this as "Trumps people where responsible for the attacks."
Meanwhile, it is you who posted links to video of "capital police handing bats to people out side the window" and "the doors opened from the in side" and thus indicated that no, you did not support the premise (that you read into the question) of Trump's ppl being behind those attacks. Thus my response in post 80, "So your answer is no (blank), that you do not support the violent actions of Jan. 6 (which is all that was first asked) as well as no to "the militant actions of Jan. 6 against protesters or any by them." And a logical deduction hardly needs your consent. That is hardly rational.
Finally, there was not "setting up a fake poll." Rather, as said, "I think this (non-commercial, internal) poll can help discern the make up of conservatives here" is what it helped to do, even if some irrational, illogical responses resulted. Meanwhile the Left has already censored me for my conservative contentions - which I warn about.
And I welcome the Admin Moderator to chime in here.
Keeping list of enemies? And yet you are the one reading collecting info into my anonymous poll!
"Admin Moderator note after I said, "I believe this will likely be used in the near future against Freerepublic." daniel1212 didn't deny this information would be use it against FR. " That is simply absurd gas lighting. I simply do not need to state such as there is simply nothing to your baseless charged. Somehow an anonymous poll which - as I showed - reveals nothing usual or unexpected of conservatives, despite your insistence on reading into into it that some (28 respondents out of a possible 178) affirmed that "Trumps people where responsible for the attacks/the violent actions of Jan. 6".
Rather, as said, it is such irrational reasoning and paranoia that makes FR look likes it needs more moderating. Give it up. Just repent and believe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.