the put it before the people to vote on
Trying to satisfy one wife is hard enough why would anyone want multiple wives is beyond me
“he put it before the people to vote”
No need in her obvious way of using the law. The judges have come to the conclusion that they can dictate law from the bench thus setting themselves up as jury and executioner also.
A perfect example was Roe. For over 50 years the courts at the federal level became the benchmark of the law and was written in a way so it could be maneuvered into any ruling that pertained to abortion whether it was a federal concern or not since the Constitution didn’t cover it and it should have been in the hands of the states and thus the people.
I can’t even start to remember the amount of court rulings that over ruled voted in laws or determinations by the people of the states that started at low levels and jumped into the federal levels at warp speed so some judge could change the decision of the hired government or the vote of the people. And don’t think the judges aren’t aware of this and apply their own personal desires on these so called decisions.
So what governs us? Is it the courts’ behind the scenes or the previously advertise vote of the people? Since the courts have the last say between elections, that answer is simple.
wy69
Don’t be silly. The “Party of Democracy” doesn’t want to allow the people to vote on these things. They prefer to find a Communist judge to impose it on us by decree.
When does that matter? Even Califreakia voted down same sex marriage initially and the courts just overruled.