Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK

There are miniaturized advances in Faraday shielding which are amazing that I have seen at shows and tech expos. There are also devices out today both nuclear and non nuclear that can generate sufficient energy for either large or small scale EMP attacks. This is due to the new thrusts going into Asymmetric warfare.


103 posted on 10/05/2022 11:47:08 AM PDT by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: DarthVader
There isn't anything high tech about Faraday cages. You can make a really good one using metal window screen, steel being the one needed to mitigate the "M" component.

Nuclear bursts in the stratosphere will also shower the place with protons. Those will collide with metal boxes, knocking electrons off the inside surfaces of the box. That secondary emission must be handled using a box inside a box.

EMP is a problem only if you are really close to the burst. For example, a 10KT ground burst causes EMP that can cause little damage when over 2 miles away. Big bombs make a higher density; however, I don't think they travel much farther than affects of the burst itself. High altitude burst with large warheads are more troublesome, but EMP from those things still follows the inverse square law. The military is concerned about all of this because the nukes will be aimed at their stuff. They want their electronics to survive a near miss.

107 posted on 10/05/2022 12:09:50 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson