Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

If you look at Russian history they have always tried to keep a buffer between them and potential aggressors and like it or not they see NATO as potential enemy. NATO moved right up to their borders, their reaction was perfectly predictable. I’m not condoning it but it was a very predictable response.


34 posted on 10/05/2022 8:41:01 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: sarge83

“If you look at Russian history they have always tried to keep a buffer between them and potential aggressors and like it or not they see NATO as potential enemy.”

And if you look further into Russian history, rather than just enough to find one talking point to support your position, then you will see that Russia generally only starts aggressive wars against weaker neighbors, not against strong alliances. So leaving them with “buffer states” instead of a strong alliance on their borders is just guaranteeing that they’ll eventually try to eat those buffer states. Rather than preventing war, this is a recipe for war.


36 posted on 10/05/2022 8:49:14 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson