Worse. JFK woke up every day knowing what day it was, who he was, and how to use both the emergency hotline and the nuclear codes.
The current resident, not so much.
That’s true however it does rather suggest that Biden on his own couldn’t trigger WW3 even if he wanted to. There’s a chain of command for launching nukes, and word would get out if it was going to happen.
Putin can’t either, but we are completely dependent on some low rank underling refusing to follow orders if he decides to launch. And there’s such a tight wall of security that the launch would most likely go unreported.
Cathi, you do know that when Henry Kissinger wrote in 2014, “The demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one”, it was in the context of Russia not threatening to use nukes (openly, e.g. by Duma deputies appearing on their own state-run, Kremlin scripted TV news station) on a weekly if not daily basis since February 2022.
Kissinger originally came from the Weimar Republic, and he wrote that in 2014. His thinking comes from a similar background to Schwab and Soros.
Globalism only works if there’s one or more superpower locked in conflict; Soros NEEDS a warm if not on-fire level of conflict between the WEF and BRICS to kick off the next phase of the Great Reset.
Soros needs Putin fixated on building his interpretation of “multipolarism” to achieve it. Defending multipolarism in the form Putin is pushing for, is Soros enablement.
If Kissinger has been watching Rossyia 1 for the last six months he can’t have missed the weekly complaints by Duma guest speakers that Putin wasn’t going all out, that Russia’s nukes could take four American cities out on top of wiping out France and Britain.
If he sees it he must understand it - and if he understands it but won’t acknowledge it, then that tells you he is in Soros’ pocket.
Time for the “Powell Doctrine”:
1) Is a vital national security interest threatened?
2) Do we have a clear attainable objective?
3) Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
4) Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted? Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
5) Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
6) Is the action supported by the American people?
7) Do we have genuine broad international support?
by today’s standards JFK was a MAGA extremist....
He can push buttons on instruction, just as intended.