Replies

Couple of thoughts; I mostly agree with Burning Brights' analysis as it makes sense. If the scare event happens as he posits, we'll know for sure. Q did say SCARE EVENT and I've thought the stolen election could have been it; but who knows. I do not agree 100% with the below, as I think a lot more people are "awake" than what he thinks, and DH and I have noticed a lot more very recently; many people are afraid to say what they really think. Dh talks to a lot of people and is VERY open, truck with "Q" and "WWG1WGA" and I think other stickers.

"Reading the above list of Crises, you might be ready to scream at your monitor that—individually or as a collection—the last two years SHOULD have been enough to properly prepare the Collective Mind for the new paradigm of bare, sometimes-brutal truth and transparency. But then, how many of your fellows continue to ostracize beliefs, truths and certainties routinely explored in this community? How many have forgiven or explained away the evils of the very institutions that have made their lives a living hell over that same time period? How many would gladly throw their own neighbors into gulags for expressing wrong-think, or would expressly cheer if such a thing were to come to pass?

Also the entire article kvetching is quite recent, I have posted whole articles for some time without creating problems, other than some mention of copyright re: Epoch articles. Yes, some people have phones. Many view FR on laptops or other devices. Do we all have to post short bits because some people have phones? doesn't make sense to me.

PS - I wanted to check Q drops for "Scare event" and cannot find it. Now wondering - what did Q say actually? I searched "scare event" and "scare". Nothing. Tried "event", 115 drops, scanned down them all, nothing.

So where did "SCARE EVENT" come from? I see no drops with it.

Hi LJ.

I’m not sure Q ever used the term “scare event”; I believe that may be an interpretation.

I’m no good at finding Q drops, but I do recall a rather long one talking about how many would be unable to accept the truth, that it would somehow drive them over the edge. (I can’t even look that up as I do not recall the words, which is one thing wrong with remembering things in the abstract)

He’s not talking about Q drops in particular, even though he is on the Q team, he even says his write-up applies whether one follows Q or not. He’s IMO trying to mimic how Trump could be using game theory within the framework of devolution and continuity of government’s boundaries. His write-up on “Bicameral Brilliance” is a good read on this subject and it ties into the article I posted upstream..

https://burningbright.substack.com/p/bicameral-brilliance

Excerpt:

.....All of these scenarios involve allowing unpleasant things to occur. Consequences. And yet, all MUST occur if the underlying structures are to be exposed, granting the public mandate that will be necessary to action change when we publicly retake the levers of power.

This sort of thinking also clues one in as to the brilliance and strategic necessity of Devolution and other Continuity of Government plans, as patriots who will ultimately lead us into a New Restoration of Sovereign Society must be separated from public leadership positions while this traumatic, but necessary awakening process is underway.

While it may seem like ALL current events, both Potential and Actual can be viewed as positive under this framework, that is true only insofar as this reading of Game Theory is accurate. I said on the Power Hour that the very fact that the enemy faction is deploying new narratives/potential events with unprecedented rapidity is evidence that they are not in control of the narrative, and the narrative, as we discuss at Burning Bright IS the battlefield. It IS the war. It IS, for our purposes today, the Game all sides are playing.

I like the posting of the full article. There will always be a divide among the posters who want the whole article and those who only want the links. When I click a link and return to FR, it always takes me back to the top of the page I left. Then I have to scroll down to find where I left off and I don’t always note the post number or remember it. There are advantages to both styles and it’s impossible to please everyone.