What is wrong is DECADES of stating, as if fact, that the Big Bang was true.
One should always state when a theory is a theory, and WHY it’s a theory. They never did, they covered up the reasons.
This is a problem with people (who are biased) vs the scientific method.
If you want to, you can see it everywhere - for example take a read on the history of Louis Pasteur, and how the founders of the theory of spontaneous generation derided and defamed him...In fact, I read his address to the Academy of Sciences - what he identified as problems with science are still at work today. (in fact, he addresses how science seems to prefer to go from one mis-truth to another rather than embracing an inconvenient (or unpopular) truth. We still observe this in strong force today. Witness the “Global Warming” now “Climate Change” Science for pay movement.
“One should always state when a theory is a theory, and WHY it’s a theory. They never did, they covered up the reasons.
This is a problem with people (who are biased) vs the scientific method.”
*The scientist did and are doing. The problem is we have biased people that rant on subjects they don’t understand.
“What is wrong is DECADES of stating, as if fact, that the Big Bang was true.
One should always state when a theory is a theory, and WHY it’s a theory. They never did, they covered up the reasons.
This is a problem with people (who are biased) vs the scientific method.”
*Science can’t control the minds of non-scientist that try to simplify concepts they cannot understand.
It’s called a theory. Why explain further? You are not forced to believe it.
A theory can not explain away God.
“What is wrong is DECADES of stating, as if fact, that the Big Bang was true.
One should always state when a theory is a theory, and WHY it’s a theory. “
That is BBT! You are the one misstating the facts.
They did call it a theory. They did explain why it is a theory.
What they didn’t do was tie you down, connect your brain to their database and click the download button.