Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hot Tabasco

Then perhaps you can tell us why the arresting officer never showed up in court and the case was thrown out? Furthermore, what is the foundation for the Miranda
__________________________________________________________
Let me put this into context. Police officers have a very difficult job. They are not constitutional law experts. And many times their job is akin to making Big Macs: We all love Big Macs, but nobody is particularly itching to watch the cows be butchered. It is not clear from the EDITED video why the police showed up at this house. And it is not uncommon for people to illegally grow marijuana and do it just off of their property (just ask about 10 of my former clients). I watched the video and these idiots were completely uncooperative and verbally obstinate with the police.

As to why the cop didn’t show up in court....As a former prosecutor, I can tell you that we routinely dropped cases based on the concept of “abated by arrest.” In other words, we knew that the cops on occasion made questionable arrests and that the arrest itself was enough punishment for the defendant whether a crime had or had not been committed. 90% of these abated by arrest cases were just like this case where the knuckleheads were obstinate. BTW, I laughed for two minutes when I heard the woman say that “she was scared of the police.” BS.

We should be encouraging citizens to show respect for the authority of the police, not sit back, be Monday morning QBs, and nit-pick every decision they make. Unfortunately, the nit-pickers and the anti-police rhetoric have caused the number of these incidents to substantially rise over the last several years.


98 posted on 09/16/2022 7:15:32 AM PDT by bort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: bort

“As a former prosecutor, I can tell you that we routinely dropped cases based on the concept of “abated by arrest.” In other words, we knew that the cops on occasion made questionable arrests and that the arrest itself was enough punishment for the defendant whether a crime had or had not been committed.”

Too late for a completely innocent person. Punished for life because of the arrest record alone guilty or not? “Enough punishment” even if a crime had been committed or not?

And you do not see a problem with this UNCONSTITUTIONAL practice and concept? We are right back to “everyone is guilty no matter what” again. “We only punished innocent people a little bit...”

Are you kidding? That is about the most inept concept and defense I have heard in my life.


110 posted on 09/16/2022 8:35:58 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: bort
As a former prosecutor,

Oh, so now, you were not only an attorney, but you were a Prosecutor.....got it!

I can tell you that we routinely dropped cases based on the concept of “abated by arrest.” In other words, we knew that the cops on occasion made questionable arrests and that the arrest itself was enough punishment for the defendant whether a crime

LOL! So you busted the balls of a known innocent citizen, forcing them to spend monies on legal defense, knowing full well they were innocent just to "teach them a lesson". A lesson from what? Make sure that uppity N####r stays in line?

You may have been a lawyer and a questionable Prosecutor, but by your own admission, you were nothing but a political hack who had no respect for the rule of law that protects all Americans.

How many times have we witnessed the same "Prosecutors" with your twisted mentality going after Trump?

116 posted on 09/16/2022 1:57:51 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Don't walk thru the watermelon patch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson