Posted on 09/14/2022 12:14:12 AM PDT by wannabegeek
There have been no recorded deaths so far from those diagnosed with monkeypox, but we now have our first report of someone who died shortly following a monkeypox vaccine.
Michael Mosher, a Hollywood makeup artist, has died 9 days after receiving a monkeypox vaccine, according to social media posts.
He was reportedly vaccinated for monkeypox on August 25, 2022, and then “died suddenly” on September 3, 2022.
Mosher was also a fan of the COVID-19 shots and fully vaccinated for COVID, while ridiculing “anti-vaxxers” who refused to get the shots.
The White House has ordered 2.5 million doses of the monkeypox vaccine, and the CDC is developing a protocol aimed at allowing use of Bavarian Nordic A/S’s Jynneos vaccine in children. (Source.)
(Excerpt) Read more at healthimpactnews.com ...
I believe i had covid 2 times, not so bad, my age is 67.
Relax, people. Death is only a side effect.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Hollywood Makeup Artist Dead 9 Days After Monkeypox Vaccine, David Chase wrote: So many times I’ve been told by anti-vaccine people that they’re against the mRNA vaccine only and not all vaccines because of various reasons but some include lack of what they think is proper testing, and waiting a decade even if waiting a decade may not be needed/required or possible.
ransomnote: Those people wanted to use the safe, effective treatments in use for decades instead of injecting the world with experimental gene therapy products. Those people were right.
But now it appears a new juicy vaccine has piqued the interest of the Covid vaccine Grifters.
Guess y’all are anti-all-vaccines as I thought.ransomnote: Your capacity to guess is even worse than your capacity to reason. The public is now aware the medical establishment is harming us, lying to us, and isn't being honest about the actual contents of the vaccine.
The fact that there are batches that result in significantly more deaths/disability than other batches means their a) is no quality control or b) is an intentional variation in the contents of which no one will tell us about. The correct answer is 'b' because, according to former Chief of Science for the Allergy and Infectious diseases wing at Pfizer, Michael Yeadon, it's simply impossible to have the wild variations in patient response based on batch simpy due to quality control issues. Not that there aren't also quality control issues, but such issues could not explain the degree of variation present.
The main hurdle however is that the Monkey Pox vaccine is Not New. The same exact vaccine that eradicated Small Pox is also just as effective on Monkey Pox.
In fact the vials say on them “Monkey Pox and Small Pox Vaccine”.ransomnote: But the hand (rocking the cradle) administering the Monkey Pox vax, the faces and voices pushing the vax are the same as those involved in the toxic Covid 'vaccine' assault on us. The same people hurting us, lying to us, threatening us about the experimental Covid gene therapy products, want us to close our eyes and think maybe THIS TIME the medical establishment is being honest about what is in the needle. Maybe THIS TIME the medical establishment will not lie to us about the adverse effects.
Also, the CDC/Fauci announced that, due to the 'success' of the Covid 'vaccines', all vaccines will use the mRNA platform going forward. I don't know if they have walked that back or just purged their press releases of that info.
I for one hope this new vaccine hysteria over the Monkey Vaccine explodes and grows.
Because 90% of Boomers have been vaccinated with the Small Pox/Monkey Pox vaccine and the stories of doom will be fascinating.So what do you think RN?
ransomnote: I waver between thinking you're sick, and that you're playfully malevolent in a particularly smarmy way.
Wow
Yeah cute dog
My guess to the fortune cookie, “You chose poorly”.
I appreciate your honesty.
My point, in a not so smarmy way is the Small Pox/Monkey Pox vaccines are everything and more that anti-Covid-vaccine people say the mRNA vaccine needs or should be.
Literally decades of study and use with decades passing after use to observe adverse reactions and long term affects.
IMO, coming out against such a vaccine as Small Pox/Monkey Pox, places someone in the against all vaccinations corner, something the anti-Covid-Vaxxers have denied since the beginning.
Explains the love-fest with Progressive Leftist RFK jr.
Meanwhile...
Joe Bastardi
@BigJoeBastardi
Denmark: No More COVID Vaccines Offered for Under-50 Gee i wonder why
igorchudov.substack.com
Denmark: No More COVID Vaccines Offered for Under-50
4:45 PM · Sep 14, 2022
·Twit
Give me a link to genotoxicity studies for ANY of the mRNA vaxxes.
Somehow after all these decades of study I can’t find any of those.
... Although this class of vaccines appears as the most effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease, their safety and efficiency are challenged by several factors included, but not limited to the following: emergence of viral variants, lack of adequate pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics studies, inability to protect oral mucosa from infection, and antibody waning...
Original antigenic sin also comes up for mention in the conclusion.
I’m not debating mRNA vaccines.
I’m strictly commenting on a traditional vaccine that has a long history of testing and use that is now in the “Birthing Room” of the Covid Anti Vaxxers as being just as dangerous and evil as they perceive the Covid-19 vaccine is.
I’m saying I have been told numerous times by the local anti-vax crowd that they’re not against all vaccines, just the mRNA vaccine.
But now there are rumblings from those people and their respective Grifters that the Small Pox /Monkey Pox vaccine is also deadly and evil.
So the anti-vax sediment is including all vaccines.
Something denied not very long ago.
I truly hope the pooche went to a safe and loving home.
$hills aren’t debating mNRA $hots.....they’re only here to PUSH them, 24/7.
Like $hift work, or, something.......
There are differences, I’ve read. Main one is the government is dividing one vaccine into 4 shots.
Saving, to reread.
Maybe it is to avoid a scar? I still have mine visible from the shot in the 70s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.