Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's failed election: MOST key counties failed to keep records!
WND ^ | 09/09/2022 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 09/10/2022 6:36:42 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski

A new report has revealed that in defiance of routine elections record-keeping strategies, and federal law, more than 90% of the key counties across the nation failed to keep their 2020 elections records.

"The America First Policy Institute made public records requests based on state-specific laws for the top 100 most-populated counties in the traditional 14 swing states that typically determine presidential elections. Ninety-four of the 100 counties did not keep records of who voted in the 2020 election, and only two state-wide election officers had the records preserved. Equally disturbing, even in the six counties that did keep records, there was on average a 2.89 percent discrepancy between the number of people voting and the number of ballots cast," said the report from John R. Lott, Jr., of the Crime Prevention Research Center, and Steve Smith, of the America First Policy Institute.

It appeared in The Federalist.

"Unfortunately, election officials across the country are not keeping the most basic data to monitor election outcomes. Even when they say they do, the numbers do not come close to matching up," they explained. "It was a simple goal: match the number of voters with the number of ballots cast. After the last general election there were concerns that ballots were counted multiple times (so that there could be more ballots cast than voters who voted) and that ballots were destroyed (so that there could be more voters who voted than ballots cast). But, through our examination, we learned that it cannot be determined if these discrepancies exist, because most states and counties simply do not keep timestamped records of who voted as required by law…"

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History
KEYWORDS: bobunruh; creepstate; deepstate; election; electionfraud; fraud; policestate; singlepartystate; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: gibsonguy

You said: “Trump claimed without proof….”

I would “trust” Trump long before any of the #ComDem_Liars or their #RINO_Republican supporters.


21 posted on 09/10/2022 7:39:14 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Bridge?

Bump


22 posted on 09/10/2022 7:41:19 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

I’m afraid to click on the link. This article seems to be full of insurrectionist, antidemocracy badthink. If I click on the link, will the FBI raid my house?

Hey, look, FBI! I’m not an insurrectionist! I’m on your side!

//OFF SARC


23 posted on 09/10/2022 8:00:50 AM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
From the article: "A new report has revealed that in defiance of routine elections record-keeping strategies, and federal law, more than 90% of the key counties across the nation failed to keep their 2020 elections records."

If it's not auditable, it's not an election.

24 posted on 09/10/2022 8:34:58 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Lol. I figured may have been sarcastic. Yet, the overall picture of the 2020 election, and the denying of democratic principles such as the State Legislatures voting laws and it’s implications are far reaching


25 posted on 09/10/2022 8:43:16 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Sheesh, l really did need to include the sarc tag


26 posted on 09/10/2022 9:08:19 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

They didn’t fail, they succeeded in hiding the true results.


27 posted on 09/10/2022 9:20:43 AM PDT by bgill (Which came first, the vax or the virus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Of course.


28 posted on 09/10/2022 9:25:22 AM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“Failed” is a funny word...


29 posted on 09/10/2022 9:28:32 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

sorry


30 posted on 09/10/2022 9:31:09 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
It usually requires an extensive investigation to gather enough evidence to prove a (digital) crime was committed.

There was -0- interest by "the controlling authorities" to do ANY investigation into election 2020(the opposite of "Russian Collusion" hoax).

The few that tried were thwarted by lack of funding/authority, not to mention... THREATS...by the "controlling authorities" themselves.

Still think this is just "politics as usual" folks?

31 posted on 09/10/2022 9:42:32 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Please Pray For My Brother Ken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

My ballots were scanned as i submitted them in every precinct i’ve visited in the last 20 years.

This should be the practice in every precinct.

additionally, every scanned image should immediately be pushed to a public block chain for record tracking, analysis, and counting.

meta information and a random digital stream could also be scanned with eaach page serving as a timestamp


32 posted on 09/10/2022 9:59:49 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The 2020 election was riddled with FRAUD.

FRAUD.


33 posted on 09/10/2022 1:30:04 PM PDT by Pearfect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“Failed” makes it sound like an oopsy-doo mistake.


34 posted on 09/10/2022 1:31:10 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

This was the response from the county board of Elections after pestering them for several days go by trying to get the records.

///////////////////////////^\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

RE: County Records Request of August 30, 2022, Reference # R000217-083022

Dear Xxxxx Xxxxxx,

Iredell County, NC received a public records request from you on August 30, 2022. Your request mentioned:

CVR (Cast Vote Record) for the 11/03/2020 Election

Iredell County, NC has reviewed its files and has determined there are no responsive record(s) to your request. Cast vote records are not accessible to the general public and there is no pending investigation concerning the 2020 general election.

For questions or additional information, please reply to this email.

Sincerely,

Iredell County

To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the Public Records Request Center


35 posted on 09/10/2022 1:31:41 PM PDT by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress !7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson