Answer one question……
You are an anonymous poster on an internet forum with no verifiable credentials, no verifiable experience, no proof of anything and yet you expect us to take you at your word just on your say so when the overwhelming amount of evidence demonstrates you are wrong.
WHY should we believe you?
Your last statement should be modified to :
WHY should we believe you NOW ?
Obviously the people who claim 'they are science' had
forgotten the fable of "The boy who cried 'Wolf" too often.
They have already lost their credibility and need to be replaced
in order to reestablish both their honor and respect.
Respect is earned, by experience, and not freely given.
metmom wrote: “Answer one question……You are an anonymous poster on an internet forum with no verifiable credentials, no verifiable experience, no proof of anything and yet you expect us to take you at your word just on your say so when the overwhelming amount of evidence demonstrates you are wrong. WHY should we believe you?”
Because I posted the real facts.
“However, in December 1976, with >40 million persons immunized and no evidence of H1N1 transmission, federal health officials decided that the possibility of an association of GBS with the vaccine, however small, necessitated stopping immunization, at least until the issue could be explored.”
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/1/05-1007_article
BTW, you’re “an anonymous poster on an internet forum with no verifiable credentials, no verifiable experience, no proof of anything and yet you expect us to take you at your word just on your say so when the overwhelming amount of evidence demonstrates you are wrong.”
Why should we believe you when you and your clan post anti-vaccine propaganda?
Everything you need to trust him is on his home page...