How was it?
I’m only a couple minutes in but here are some reviews...
A Pett
6 hours ago
Pretty good debate with compelling argument from both sides. I feel some of Trump’s accomplishments were glossed over especially with regard to how he crafts policy to effect an outcome such as remain in Mexico, Abraham accords, Nordstream 2 and NATO. Win some/lose some, but anyone thinking Trump is an idiot is clearly not paying attention or just delusional.
James Townsend
7 hours ago
Styxx crushed it. Long time Michigan clanker.
Jamie London
8 hours ago (edited)
Only a little under half way through but really enjoying this. I’m a big fan of both so I’m just vibing lol
farfiman
8 hours ago (edited)
One thing Dave does not say ( not really part of the debate) is what his alternative is. It’s easy to say “I won’t support Trump in 2024” because xyz but who would do better (and has a chance in winning)?
Todd Losure
6 hours ago
More of a discussion than a debate. Loved it. I think Styx had a more accurate take but I can see both sides. Honestly amazing how good Trump did knowing now how much he was up against.
james ballew
6 hours ago
Dave, politics is the art of the possibility. Trump’s not perfect, but a hell of a lot better than the alternatives.
Max C
8 hours ago
As a massive fan of both dave and styx. Styxx sounded way more reasonable here. Dave sounds like he mad trump wasnt the perfect libertarian
Alskari
6 hours ago (edited)
I understand why Dave is frustrated with Trump, but he’s also judging Trump from basically a tantrum. Lots of mindreading and silliness. Frankly lost a lot of respect for him over the course of the debate. Way too much emotional thinking.
M S
7 hours ago
Styx666 is a genius and knows how to have a debate. He can speak solo or in a group, composed and deliberate.
Oceanfreak6
7 hours ago (edited)
Styx scooped up this win with the clankiest spoon in his cupboard 🥄
Fantastic debate between two titans 💙
Joe M
5 hours ago
Dave is analyzing EVERYTHING from a hindsight perspective. You have to look through Trump’s actions through the lens of that point in time.
Petra Tilling
7 hours ago
So Dave’s argument is basically, “Trump isn’t Ron Paul”.
Helicopter Rides For Communists
8 hours ago
Man - if only Trump had 2020-Hindsight as all of you do, he wouldn’t have made any mistakes at all. It’s almost like he didn’t have access to all of the same information and clear understanding that we have now - 2 years after all of this, 2 years of contemplating all of it and analyzing it. When considering Trump’s job and legacy as President you MUST - and this is absolutely critical - you MUST analyze it based on what the context of the situation was at the time and based on what was KNOWN AT THE TIME, not 2, 2-half + years later.
Joe M
5 hours ago
Dave is analyzing EVERYTHING from a hindsight perspective. You have to look through Trump’s actions through the lens of that point in time.
+1 GME
6 hours ago
I respect both men. I do however feel like Styx had the better arguments and won my vote