I have an idea. Why doesn’t Kirsch pay an accredited medical examiner to do an autopsy on a body that a family consents to the autopsy?
And then PUBLISH the results?
I see some pictures on this thread of what are purported to be human relations. In several jurisdictions (New York, Ohio, etc), that’s considered mishandling of remains. Does the family know that remains from their loved one are being used in that way?
My guess is no. Because it’s all about the narrative.
I doubt they are real human remains.
Probably some part of an animal.
People that are Lying will take a Polygraph exam in hopes the machine fails and shows they are not lying. Even though they are. This often fails.
So send in some weird undiscovered samples to a Lab that don’t even contain any materials remotely related to human and call it a day.
See, proof.
But it’s not. The Lab only proved whatever they received for testing wasn’t human like.