Politics aside, I don’t know why anyone should be surprised that an experimental vaccine (gene therapy?) would have adverse effects.
When my wife received her inoculations, she received no literature on possible adverse effects. Whenever we receive a drug, no matter how well established it may be, we receive a copious amount of literature on the risks. As a general matter, I don’t see why vaccines would be any different. Does anyone recall their experience? In this particular case, I think warning literature was intentionally suppressed.
By my recollection, Pfizer and Moderna were given legal protection (partial or complete) from lawsuits. This may have been justifiable given the hysteria associated with the Wuhan virus and the pace of Operation Warp Speed. Under these circumstances, why should anyone be surprised at increase in excess deaths?
The Democrats have a history of mandates: slavery, segregation, busing, the trail of tears, affirmative action, etc. So perhaps it is no surprise that Uncle Joe would mandate inoculations. I think inoculation mandates were totally wrong. With the passage of time, the evidence is mounting, and any justification is waning.
Does anyone know how the politics lined up for the Tuskegee experiments?
But some freepers still beleive in the jabs!
~~~~~
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/wayne-root-blame-covid-vaccine-disaster-coverup-hint-not-president-donald-j-trump/
bkmk