Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Zealand news anchor with traditional face tattoo blasts viewer’s racist comments
NBC News ^ | Aug. 25, 2022 | Tat Bellamy-Walker

Posted on 08/27/2022 9:36:20 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last
To: MinorityRepublican

challenge accepted-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiKFYTFJ_kw


101 posted on 08/27/2022 4:51:47 PM PDT by Pelham (World War III is entering on cat's feet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat

That your King James Bible means nothing to them, so your statement is null and void concerning them.


102 posted on 08/27/2022 4:53:36 PM PDT by eastforker (All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Haka time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BORnyN5n3CI


103 posted on 08/27/2022 4:57:24 PM PDT by Pelham (World War III is entering on cat's feet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Again the point is they are the CHOICE of the WEARER. They were NOT born with it having no choice.

Thus I can judge all I want.


104 posted on 08/27/2022 6:48:45 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Concur. The first thought that occurred to me was, “Is she good at her job?” That’s shorthand for not judging a book by its cover. In a meritocracy, performance counts. She’s in New Zealand where those tattoos are probably acceptable to the general public.


105 posted on 08/27/2022 7:00:36 PM PDT by Silentgypsy (In my defense, I was left unsupervised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

That your King James Bible means nothing to them, so your statement is null and void concerning them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Dude, you’re firing at the wrong person because I never made the statement you’re referring to!


106 posted on 08/27/2022 7:13:22 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (Democrat politicians and voters are dangerous psychopaths. They confirm it everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

The British as you call them are a collection of vikings, and Normans as well as Anglo Saxons and native Brits. A collection of people who took over people. They mingled and the strongest took over those near.

Your history knowledge is crap. Its Naive. And its assuming that the world started a few hundred years ago. Do some research. Think for once. How did the Scots get there? How did the Welsh get there? who was before them? Who are the Brits? Use your mind.


107 posted on 08/27/2022 8:24:47 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Human biology exists at a very early stage in our ancestry. Our oldest ancestors depended on facial recognition and communication. We detect human faces and can identify and differentiate them before we can add two plus two or say “mama”. To alter our face is to alter ability to attract the opposite sex, to read emotions, to see someone as friend or foe. Culture is a trait that is not nearly as ingrained as innate knowledge. Culture is learned. Facial recognition is in our DNA, its there before we are born.

Like female genital mutilation that is also cultural, facial mutilation or discoloring, is also problematic. Even if a quaint tribe does it in indigenous costume for the tourists.


108 posted on 08/27/2022 8:37:07 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

If you’re trying to justify what the U.S. government did to the Native Americans who existed in this country at that time, or what the British did to the Scots, Irish, Welsh, and the rest of the people in countries they colonized, please hold your breath.


I’m not holding my breath, I’m telling you that others would have wiped out those weaker civilizations. Killed their men and children. Raped their women. And ate what ever parts that the animals did not eat.

Where do you get off thinking that being conquered has rules. The only rules are whether your women are comely and useful. And if you can be useful slaves. If not your all dead. This is the way of the world in human history, in animal history going back to the beginning of time. If you exist today, Than your ancestors were part of the conquerors.


109 posted on 08/27/2022 8:46:12 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: poinq

LOL!! The majority of my DNA is British and northwestern Europe. The second highest is Sweden and Denmark, third Germanic Europe, and fourth Scotland, so I’m one of those mongrels that you speak of. I’m an old lady, and I’m certainly not naive. I’ve been a student of all periods of history for well over 40 years, and continue to learn more about the world, its history, and people each day.

For example, did you know that recent DNA studies have shown that some tribes in the Amazon, for example, Brazil’s Surui people, share a common ancestor with indigenous Australians and New Guineans. A large number of people got where they ended up by migrating...not always warring, and killing each other off. A lot of it was done by crossing a land bridge called Beringia, also known as the Bering Strait Land Bridge that formed toward the latter part of the Ice Age, that connected their native home in Eurasia to modern-day Alaska. This DNA study, along with others have caused a big stir, because the main theory has always been that the first humans in North America had come over in one big wave, but these new DNA studies, have knocked that theory down. Nobody knows how many people came via Beringa, or how many waves they came in.


110 posted on 08/27/2022 9:30:04 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I don’t find that tattooing attractive but it’s her face and her culture. None of my business.


111 posted on 08/27/2022 10:49:15 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Ok

You’ve ended our exchange about your choice is words and I agree their comments were mean but hey you know where you’re posting

For the record I wrote she was handsome but I didn’t like the ink culture or not

I don’t care for ink much even though my left shoulder is covered in earned ink


112 posted on 08/28/2022 12:15:29 AM PDT by wardaddy (Lawyers guns and money……I lived it…. Now I'm old…. I have wonderful children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: moovova

Snort...GMTA!


113 posted on 08/28/2022 12:27:12 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Don't rush to your death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson