The “dirty dozen” as you call it is a leftist Pharma smear which even Facebook admits has no basis in fact. You aligning yourself with a group which colludes with govt to censor contrary opinion is very telling. You’re spouting Biden WH talking points.
They refer to it as the disinformation dozen. I did not consult that website. However there is little support in the medical and science community for these hucksters. They have demonstrably lined their wallets with their anti vaccine stance.
In my judgment they are opportunistic and pronounce with great authority unfounded results. Take the above post. Kirsch had a graph predicting high mortality at 10 years. Yet the main complaint of Q theory is no long term studies. How with a straight face can such a rock ribbed prediction be made with the complaint about not studied long enough. It’s laughable.
The fact of the matter is breathlessly worrying about dark field studies that are suspect as hell and pointing to conditions (if they exist) of no relevance os absurd. Take for example the breathless report of rouleaux early this week. It’s clot shots don’t you know. Actually the differential is quite large it was seen often even before covid vaccination. And it’s clinical significance is not all that much except for the presence can lead to certain diagnoses.
It’s the difference between repeating and understanding info.
As for the dirty dozen, they have made a lot of money stoking fires of at best marginal evidence leading many to bad conclusions. This is my problem with them. The scientific process allows for great room for interpretation.
The data are clear. The quantity and severity of complication from covid vaccination is not nearly as much as the Q theorists would like everyone to believe. When confronted with extrapolations that are of questionable validity there is no other response beside being called names and threatened. The aggregate of the data do not near that significant complications are occurring in a majority of recipients.
As was pointed out above 260 million people have received at least on covid vaccination. But instead of dealing with the data, unsubstantiated assumptions are made about conspiracy. If you want to refute the credibility of data it simply must be more than certain people do not believe the institution that published it. Cross referencing from multiple sources the 260 million miner is about correct.
People are not dying at now 2.5 years of strange things related to this vaccination
People are not sticking to flag poles when they walk by them.
There is no substantial data there is s programmed explosion of death coming.
And again you have ignored my question. If you believe murder has occurred name the elements of the crime and name the suspects. File police reports. Make complaints. Your lack of answering direct questions about your arguments and language clearly speaks volumes as to your veracity as someone who believes in what they are saying.
So i ask again directly. You represent you have evidence of a crime. Have you pursued it with law enforcement? If not, perhaps you should express your opinion as you mean it instead of dishonestly.