I will take it under advisement. But to be clear it is not the substance of what is posted. It is the uneven application of the rules. It appears to many of us that some are more equal than others. I am fine with donating with a free and robust conversation no matter how strange it is. I am not ok with paying to get bludgeoned and penalized while other far more egregious actors have penalties overturned immediately or are untouchable.
When the rules are equally applied I will happily restore my donations.
In the meantime I need to go continue being Dr Mengele, stand trial for crimes against humanity, be hung from a yard arm, collect my enormous paycheck from Pfizer, be a $hot $hill and either actively doxxed (yes it finally happened) or be threatened with lawsuits to which I say to those go ahead. Bring a lawsuit. I have nothing better to do than tie them up in discovery for years and bleed them of their resources. My lawyers would enjoy the exercise of that discovery. As it turns out they have heard of what had been posted here and would enjoy trying some of their legal theories in formal proceedings. I would enjoy it too.
So remind me why I should donate? If an when there is just an equal application of the rules I will again support and double my monthly donation.
Re: 200 - you bring up good points about the comments. I’ve see more than a few comments by several FReepers about wanting to dox you for your viewpoints. This from so called conservatives.
You’ve contributed a lot to FR. I appreciate your efforts.