This “study” isn’t worth bothering with. Have you ever seen a proper study with such polemic in it as this one? And how about citing infamous anti-vaxxers* Gatti and Montanari of all people?
From the “study” featured in The Expose:
“What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines”. In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.”
From Dr Gorski:
“The saga of Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari is a fairly amusing one, too, because after that paper was published, they lashed out at critics. Unsurprisingly, they soon descended deeper and deeper into conspiracy theories after Italian authorities started investigating them for financial chicanery. In any case, they provided yet further evidence of a new quack idea about vaccines and “contaminants,” namely that nanoparticles in vaccines, medicines, food, and water are the “one true cause” of disease. In that context, it shouldn’t be surprising that antivaxxers have been trying to portray the lipid nanoparticles used in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA-base COVID-19 vaccines as horrific “toxins.”
https://www.respectfulinsolence.com/2022/01/14/under-the-microscope-antivaxxers-find-impurities-in-covid-19-vaccines/
[Read at link for all the inline links to other sources in original.]
Here, Dr. Gorski is discussing another goofy vax doomer claim, but it could apply to this one as well (link already given above):
“To me it looks like it’s a tiny crystal or fragment that could easily have come from the slides, the coverslips, or from any of the handling of the “leftover” Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines that were supposedly examined. Personally, as was the case with Gatti and Montanarri, I marveled at how hard these antivaxxers had to search to find even just two examples of these crystal-like contaminants. Here’s the thing. We have the tools to figure out exactly what these things are, external contaminants from the environment or something in the vaccine itself, and exactly what. Why do these “scientists” not use these tools and pursue a line of investigation that could tell us what they are? The reason is simple: It’s easier to scare the rubes this way, and further investigation could easily reveal that these “contaminants” are air bubbles, salt crystals, hair, or textile fibers. Seriously, to the pathologists out there: Look at the video, starting around the 2 hour mark, and tell me what you see in the videos shown! I realize that many of these images are darkfield microscopy, which is known to produce much more dramatic-looking images of things, but geez.To me it looks like it’s a tiny crystal or fragment that could easily have come from the slides, the coverslips, or from any of the handling of the “leftover” Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines that were supposedly examined. Personally, as was the case with Gatti and Montanarri, I marveled at how hard these antivaxxers had to search to find even just two examples of these crystal-like contaminants. Here’s the thing. We have the tools to figure out exactly what these things are, external contaminants from the environment or something in the vaccine itself, and exactly what. Why do these “scientists” not use these tools and pursue a line of investigation that could tell us what they are? The reason is simple: It’s easier to scare the rubes this way, and further investigation could easily reveal that these “contaminants” are air bubbles, salt crystals, hair, or textile fibers. Seriously, to the pathologists out there: Look at the video, starting around the 2 hour mark, and tell me what you see in the videos shown! I realize that many of these images are darkfield microscopy, which is known to produce much more dramatic-looking images of things, but geez.
Again, this is from Dr. Gorski’s debunking of another vax doomer claim (which of course one that was posted on FR), but could well apply to this one:
The technique is called a number of things besides live blood cell analysis, such as dark-field video analysis, nutritional blood analysis, and many others. Usually, the cells are observed under dark field, which is a type of microscopy that makes objects appear to stand out against a dark background. Virtually always live cell analysis is performed by chiropractors, naturopaths, and other “alternative medicine” or “alternative health” practitioners.
[snip]
These are the same sort of uninterpretable images that live blood cell analysis practitioners always produce to impress their marks. They mean nothing, as CAP has pointed out. For one thing, how blood looks under the microscope can vary greatly depending on how the slides are prepared and how long the blood has been allowed to sit on the slide before observation. The test is basically completely unreliable to diagnose anything, other than maybe blood that’s been left out too long and has started to dry out or clot, as Edzard Ernst has written many times.
https://www.respectfulinsolence.com/2022/08/24/live-blood-analysis-and-thermography-quackery-applied-to-covid-19/
You’ll have to go to the links and scroll around to see the images and what he’s talking about.
*Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari are not just Covid vax doomers, they’re anti-vaxxers from way back. And have a rather colorful history.