It does not appear (yet) that everyone who got vaccinated had harmful effects on their body. I wonder if this is because different batches of the “vaccines” have different amounts of various ingredients or because of the differences in people’s personal immune system’s, etc.
There are now 3,500 people examining the Pfizer documents as they are released (under court order) each month. As they report significant findings to the scientists, doctors and lawyers working on the project, perhaps we will find out. ...at least about the differences in different batches of the vaccines.
FDA wanted 75 years to hide Pfizer’s vaxx - adverse effects data..
There’s also the issue of supposed intramuscular injections ending up being intravenous injections due to (intentional?) skipping of the step traditionally used to ensure the delivered dose will largely remain at the injection site rather than be introduced into the bloodstream and thereby distributed throughout the body.
That step is as follows: Pulling the stopper back out slightly after the needle has been inserted. If blood appears in the vial, this indicates that the end of the needle has entered a vein, and that the needle should be removed, and that particular dose thrown away.
The notion is that the near universal skipping of this step may account for some if not all of the variation in the incidence of side effects. Those whose intramuscular injection ended up being intravenous being the ones who got the booby prize.