Replies

The truth is the “climate side” people have only ever counted what they claim is (a) (1) needed CO2 reductions by (2) x date.

Before going back to (a) 2, the date, asking how needed that date is, we can first address the biggest questions which are all about (a) (1), the supposed needed CO2 reductions.

In that regard the alarmists have no calculations, in terms of engineering studies, feasability studies, supple side studies or economic impact studies. In other words they have demands with no reasonable thought out plans of how to get there without doing worse economic damage than any supposed climate damage.

There have been engineering studies and feasibility studies done by others outside of the climate alarmists, and all of them say that do to engineering issues, energy production issues and supply side issues, attempting to achieve the immediate demands with immediate mandates will make the possible so called “solutions” more expensive year by year, leaving them wholly unachievable or barelt achievable with hefty increasing government subsidies and even deeper mandates outside of transportation to try to make up for what cannot be achieved in transportation.

The green aganda is some combination of a fools errand carried out in ignorance by leaders, whith the political leaders being conned into an attmept at total socialist centrally planned global economy - with CO2 as merely the wedge with which to do it.

None of it is necessary, even if there are any merits to containing the growth of man-made CO2 that is released to the atmosphere.

Why?

That takes us back to the date needed for the claimed levels of CO2 reductions.

At the highest stated CO2 reduction demands being made now, the rise in the accumulated atmospheric CO2 will continue, far at least 100 to possily 200 years before annual increases slow enough to stop the overall increase.

That means the economy will keep getting pooer and poorer - more expensive - chasing CO2 today, while even by the end of the first 100 years the “average global temperature” (according to the alarmists own science) will bave reached climate harmful conditions.

And by then where will all the needed measures to mitigate and adjust to that change be? They will not have happened because the needed monie was thrown into chasing CO2 INSTEAD of the changes needed to adapt to and mitigate the affects of all the differen climate changes.

The green agenda is a Pol Pot style agenda against the world. Destroy it to recreate it, in someone’s evil maniacal global utopian agenda.