Is that you, Ratsberger?
Ha. I have no idea who Ratsberger is, but he ain't me.
Freepers who question my "100 feet" claim in post #20 above are welcome to read the letter from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to True the Vote linked here:
https://twitter.com/stphnfwlr/status/1451309892824936452
D’Souza accepted the 100 foot radius for TTV's geospatial tracking in his interview by the Washington Post’s Philip Bump:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/discussing-gaps-2000-mules-with-dinesh-dsouza/
Bump mentions the 100 foot radius several times, and D’Souza does not correct him.
Just search the article for “100”. Of course this is the biased Washington Post, but just pay attention to D'Souza's own words.
D’Souza, as usual, keeps pushing the line that cell phone tracking can be very accurate. However, he never specifies in 2000 Mules how close a mule had to come to a ballot box to count as a mule visit. Why not? Now we all know the answer.
When 2000 Mules was released, it was reasonable to say, "Time will tell." If the film had exposed the biggest election conspiracy in American history, confirming evidence would have quickly flooded in.
That did not happen. Time has told. We were conned.