Again, you seem to be fixated on the distance factor. First, Dinesh is not the expert. He was the filmmaker. TTV has the experts.
Let’s assume for the sake of argument that 100 feet is the number. The other variables that went into identifying the mules are dispositive for me. The distance is just one factor.
Did you watch TTV today? Do you grasp the legal issues associated with revealing the identities of the NGOs and mules? One mule has come forward and TTV is working with the police in various counties like Yuma and Racine. Englebrecht said that since 2010 there has not been one day that she has not been in court. At one point five government agencies were investigating her re her personal and business activities. I first met Catherine at CPAC in 2010 where we both had booths. I have the highest respect for her integrity and patriotism. She is not a liar or a fool. I trust her judgment and competence.
I have no knowledge of who you are, but I can say unequivocally and without reservation that Trump and the American people are very lucky to have TTV on their side.
Thank you...and we wonder why we lose elections. I am of the opinion the whole west coast is fraud vote central. I lived through the Rossi debacle in WA State...but it started way before then..
Again, you seem to not understand that the "distance factor" is critically important. If TTV's data is valid only to within a radius of 100 feet, as was effectively confirmed by D'Souza in his Philip Bump interview, then TTV's mule hypothesis cannot be supported. The whole film goes down the drain, as it should. It is a con, that successfully fleeced plenty of conservatives, and wasted our time.
Here's a portion of D'Souza's interview with the Washington Post's Philip Bump:
Bump: Yes. An ankle bracelet can tell when you’re walking down the street or when you’re on your property, but it’s not going to be able to tell you which room you’re in.In other words, TTV admits that they did not actually track any of the supposed mules to ballot boxes, as they stated. They don't distinguish between a mule at a ballot dropbox and someone driving past that dropbox on a road 30 yards away. TTV's entire case against the supposed mule is based on where he went after he came within 100 feet of the dropbox. Ha! Try taking that to court!But we can set this aside, because even True the Vote doesn’t claim they get that accurate. They put these geofencing around these drop box locations — they use a 100-foot radius. And that’s according to the documents from the GBI, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. If you were within 100 feet of a drop-box location —
D’Souza: Okay. I have two observations about this.
Bump: — you’re not necessarily anywhere near a drop box.
D’Souza: I have two observations about this. One is I think you will agree that geotracking can clearly tell the difference between someone who is in motion and someone who is stationary. Agree?
Bump: Yeah. If you have data over time.
D’Souza: Okay. Yeah. In other words, if you have geotracking through time, you can tell. All right. So there’s a big difference between walking by a drop box and walking to a drop box. And you can tell that difference, correct. Or do you disagree with that?
Bump: Well, I disagree because you don’t know when someone is actually going to the drop box.
D’Souza: What I’m saying is if you’re following — if you’re making a blue line of someone going through time, right, if they walk by the drop box, you will have a smooth line of somebody going right by the drop box and continuing onward. If someone goes to the drop box and stops there, right? That’s a whole different line. It’s a blue line that comes to a stop and then it turns around, and the person obviously goes back to that car or wherever they came from. So there’s a difference between going to a point — so, see, if you don’t agree with me on this, this is basically geotracking 101.
Bump: Let me give you an alternate scenario. You’ve been to a public library before. When you go to the public library, do you have to take the books inside or no?
D’Souza: Yeah, sometimes you can take the books inside and sometimes they have a return place so you can put books.
Bump: Exactly. So sometimes are there sometimes at public library forms you can pick up, tax forms on a little table in the lobby, things like that. Have you ever seen that before at a library? Have you ever seen a library which had a book sale outside? There are all sorts of explanations here which have people going to libraries —
D’Souza: I just want to draw out the absurdity of what you’re saying, because —
Bump: We’re talking about being within 100 feet. There are all sorts of reasons people could go to a library, including being an employee for the library, including being employees of the county who are going to the drop boxes. There are all sorts of reasons to go to multiple libraries. There are all sorts of reasons to walk up to a library, to drive by a library. And we again are taking your word for it. We don’t have specific location data which shows these people doing anything besides coming within 100 feet of a library where there has to be a drop box.
D’Souza: Okay, so pause right there. Because first of all, let’s return to — now you’re free to disbelieve the data. But what I’m saying is this: We’re talking about 10 or more drop boxes now. It’s possible that one drop box is near a library, but you have to admit that drop boxes are not only points in front of libraries. Many drop boxes are by the side of the road. Sometimes you have to get off the highway and take a turn. So drop boxes are all over the place. Bump: Have you seen where the Atlanta drop boxes were? [Of the 36 locations in Fulton County, 28 were at libraries.]
D’Souza: So the library explanation works in that one isolated context. But if I’m saying — it’s kind of like saying, you know, again, if you have a guy and he is within, let’s even take your 100 feet measure, which —
Bump: Comes from True the Vote.
D’Souza: And you have a person, a suspect who is within a 100 feet of 10 dead bodies, but one dead body happened to be near a location where he could have had a plausible reason for going there but there’s no plausible reason for being near all the 10 dead bodies, that’s the key point.
The notion that TTV had the time, resources, or data to carefully track the precise motions of every possible mule who came near a dropbox is laughable. It did not happen.
As for the accuracy of a cellphone's 'Find My Phone' feature, that has nothing to do with the geospatial accuracy of the data purchased by True the Vote.