Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

I cannot imagine there is a long list to review.

Keep in mind, you are hearing one side of the story. The key to this entire story is the affidavit. And we won’t hear anything about that until there is an indictment.

I am sitting on a grand jury right now. I can tell you that there have been several “ham sandwiches” that didn’t pass our smell test. I imagine any indictment starting with “Donald Trump” is going to raise some heated discussion in the back room.

My point is that rumors and innuendo love a vacuum. People are coming up with all sorts of fantastical stories about what is going on. The truth is, we don’t know. And we are receiving biased stories from all over the place.

There are plenty of folks on FR who are “law and order” folks. They are quick to point out when someone doesn’t follow the rules. Except when its Trump—then its a grand conspiracy.

My final point is we should be overly cautious about believing stories that are made up from the ether. We should double check ourselves and look at evidence, not speculation.


102 posted on 08/12/2022 9:19:02 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt
The truth is, we don’t know. And we are receiving biased stories from all over the place.

True.

My final point is we should be overly cautious about believing stories that are made up from the ether. We should double check ourselves and look at evidence, not speculation.

There are days when I feel like being very serious, and there are days when this stuff is just a lark. My serious side says yes, we should exercise great caution in accepting what we hear.

My non serious side will say "Too good to check." and run with it. I guess I have not quite yet reached the level of maturity I should have.

:)

103 posted on 08/12/2022 12:18:46 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

We should double check ourselves and look at evidence, not speculation.


Good point.

this to me is going to come down to : declassification and who has the authority”

If its factual that the President, no matter how documented called for it and it valid the game is over.

I expect the weasel argument will be he may have called for it , but it was never done......

Sets up deniability for the raid, and leaves the impression he did have top secret/classifed info which he shouldn’t have had.

Also the weasels will use we “ cant disclose” as its too serious so we will be subjected to the MSM spinmachine forever.


104 posted on 08/12/2022 12:24:22 PM PDT by patriotspride (Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson